The SpaceX Archive

Falcon 1 Maiden Flight Updates: March

March 15, 2006 SpaceX Mailing List

Falcon 1 has been removed from its hangar and erected on the launch pad. All systems are currently go for a static fire on March 17 or 18, followed by a launch between March 20 and 25.

—Elon

Falcon being rolled out of the hangar; On the launch pad, ready for system checks. Credit: Chris Thompson/SpaceX
March 21, 2006 SpaceX Mailing List

We had a great static fire today.  Falcon was held down for almost three seconds of thrust (T+0.5s), part of which was under autonomous thrust vector control.  All systems were green and no aborts were triggered.

Unless we discover something negative after a detailed data analysis, launch will happen on Thursday at 1p.m. California time.

—Elon

March 22, 2006 SpaceX Mailing List

No major issues were discovered following the static fire, but, as a cautionary measure, we are going to take one more day to review data and verify system functionality.  Launch is now scheduled for Friday at 1 p.m. California time.

—Elon

March 24, 2006 10:30am SpaceX Mailing List

Launch is scheduled for today at 1 p.m. California time.

March 24, 2006 1:14pm SpaceX Mailing List

Revised T-zero time is 2:30 p.m. California time today.

Webcast is Now Available: http://www.spacex.com/?content=webcast. Please note the feed will be coming over a satellite link, so users will experience periodic interruptions. When video freezes, merely restart/refresh program.

March 24, 2006 3:00pm SpaceX Mailing List

We had a successful liftoff and Falcon made it well clear of the launch pad, but unfortunately the vehicle was lost later in the first stage burn.  More information will be posted once we have had time to analyze the problem.

—Elon

March 25, 2006 SpaceX Mailing List

Preliminary SpaceX Internal Analysis

(Note: There will be a formal US Government led anomaly investigation in partnership with SpaceX.  The report issued by that team will reflect the fully considered official opinion.  The website updates reflect only the preliminary analysis of SpaceX and are provided pursuant to our policy of early and full disclosure.)

The good news is that all vehicle systems, including the main engine, thrust vector control, structures, avionics, software, guidance algorithm, etc. were picture perfect.  Falcon’s trajectory was within 0.2 degrees of nominal during powered flight.

However, at T+25s, a fuel leak of currently unknown origin caused a fire around the top of the main engine that cut into the first stage helium pneumatic system.  On high resolution imagery, the fire is clearly visible within seconds after liftoff.  Once the pneumatic pressure decayed below a critical value, the spring return safety function of the pre-valves forced them closed, shutting down the main engine at T+29s.

It does not appear as though the first stage insulation played a negative role, nor are any other vehicle anomalies apparent from either the telemetry or imaging.  Falcon was executing perfectly on all fronts until fire impaired the first stage pneumatic system.

Our plan at this point is to analyze data and debris to be certain that the above preliminary analysis is correct and then isolate and address all possible causes for the fuel leak.  In addition, we will do another ground up systems review of the entire vehicle to flush out any other potential issues.

I cannot predict exactly when the next flight will take place, as that depends on the findings of this investigation and ensuring that our next customer is comfortable that all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure reliability.  However, I would hope that the next launch occurs in less than six months.

It is perhaps worth noting that those launch companies that succeeded also took their lumps along the way.  A friend of mine wrote to remind me that only 5 of the first 9 Pegasus launches succeeded; 3 of 5 for Ariane; 9 of 20 for Atlas; 9 of 21 for Soyuz; and 9 of 18 for Proton.  Having experienced firsthand how hard it is to reach orbit, I have a lot of respect for those that persevered to produce the vehicles that are mainstays of space launch today.

I am very encouraged and grateful that our launch customers took the time to call and express their support of SpaceX when their reaction could easily have been the opposite.  We will stand by them as they have stood by us. SpaceX is in this for the long haul and, come hell or high water, we are going to make this work.

As SpaceX is a company that believes in maximum disclosure (within the boundaries of proprietary data and ITAR restrictions), I will try to post as much as possible about this launch attempt over the coming weeks.

—Elon

Falcon Taking Off; Engine Closeup Showing Fire. Credit: Thom Rogers/SpaceX